中国医疗美容杂志

期刊简介

《中国医疗美容》CN11-6007/R月刊,是由国家卫生健康委员会主管、国家新闻出版总署认定学术期刊,国家卫生健康委员会认定的“A类”学术期刊,属于医药卫生类临床医学期刊。中国整形美容协会名誉会长、中国工程院院士张志愿为本刊主编;北京大学第三医院成形外科(整形外科)主任赵振民教授,北京大学人民医院副院长王建六教授,中日友好医院口腔医学中心主任徐宝华教授,首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院妇科微创中心主任段华教授,湖南省人民医院整形科主任谭军教授,复旦大学附属华山医院皮肤科副主任吴文育教授,复旦大学附属中山医院整形外科主任亓发芝教授,上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院整复外科副主任李圣利教授为本刊副主编(排名不分先后)。邮发代号82-366。目前为中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库、中文科技期刊数据库、中国期刊全文数据库CNKI、中国学术期刊(光盘版)、中国学术期刊综合评价数据库收录。本刊为唯一的国家级的涵盖医疗美容全学科的学术期刊,办刊着眼于医疗美容学科的未来发展方向,以新理论、新技术与临床经验相结合的模式推动医疗美容的稳步、健康发展,以百家争鸣为方针给予医疗美容工作者一个互动交流的平台。刊登文章以近年重点基础研究、技术开发研究为主,辅助医疗美容工作者临床、科研决策。

亚太热带医药杂志(英文版)征稿启事

时间:2023-08-11 10:34:00

68.jpg

Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine《亚太热带医学杂志(英文版)》(月刊),创刊于2008年,由海南医学院主办、国际著名出版集团Elsevier(爱思唯尔)出版、发行,是目前中国唯一一本全英文版的国际性热带医药期刊(月刊)。


Instructions to Authors

A manuscript will be reviewed for possible publication with the understanding that it is being submitted to Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine alone at that point in time and has not been published anywhere, simultaneously submitted, or already accepted for publication elsewhere. The journal expects that authors would authorize one of them to correspond with the Journal for all matters related to the manuscript. All manuscripts received are duly acknowledged. On submission, editors review all submitted manuscripts initially for suitability for formal review. Manuscripts with insufficient originality, serious scientific or technical flaws, or lack of a significant message are rejected before proceeding for formal peer-review. Manuscripts that are unlikely to be of interest to the Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine readers are also liable to be rejected at this stage itself.

Manuscripts that are found suitable for publication in Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine are sent to two or more expert reviewers. During submission, the contributor is requested to provide names of two or three qualified reviewers who have had experience in the subject of the submitted manuscript, but this is not mandatory. The reviewers should not be affiliated with the same institutes as the contributor/s. However, the selection of these reviewers is at the sole discretion of the editor. The journal follows a double-blind review process, wherein the reviewers and authors are unaware of each other’s identity. Every manuscript is also assigned to a member of the editorial team, who based on the comments from the reviewers takes a final decision on the manuscript. The comments and suggestions (acceptance/ rejection/ amendments in manuscript) received from reviewers are conveyed to the corresponding author. If required, the author is requested to provide a point by point response to reviewers’ comments and submit a revised version of the manuscript. This process is repeated till reviewers and editors are satisfied with the manuscript.

Manuscripts received from Editorial Board members will be screened by the Executive Editor-in-Chief and sent to external peer reviewers. The editorial board members who are authors will be excluded from publication decisions.

Manuscripts accepted for publication are copy edited for grammar, punctuation, print style, and format. Page proofs are sent to the corresponding author. The corresponding author is expected to return the corrected proofs within three days. It may not be possible to incorporate corrections received after that period. The whole process of submission of the manuscript to final decision and sending and receiving proofs is completed online. To achieve faster and greater dissemination of knowledge and information, the journal publishes articles online as ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance.